On the Principle of Least Action

Image result for Leibniz Public Domain

Gottfried Leibniz

In The Feynman Lectures on Physics, V1, Chapter 19, Richard Feynman states that, in any system conforming to F=ma, the average kinetic energy, <T>, minus the average potential energy, <U>, for the actual motion is always less than it would be for other, imagined motions. The value <T>-<U> is called the “Action.” 

For reasons to be made clear, we shall amend that statement to read “In any system conforming to F=ma, the absolute value of the action for the actual motion is always less than it would be for other, imagined motions.”

Let us consider the case of a mass |m| oscillating on an ideal spring of spring constant k. The amplitude of the oscillation is A, and the frequency is ω=(k/|m|)1/2. The motion is along the x-axis with x=A sin(ωt) and v=ωA cos(ωt). The kinetic energy, T, at any time is |m|v2/2, and the potential energy, U, is kx2/2. The total energy, E, equals T+U, and is constant throughout an oscillation period. 

The time average kinetic energy, <T>, is the definite integral of (T)dt over the interval t=0 to t=2π/ω, divided by 2π/ω. Similarly for the average potential energy, <U>. The “action” of this system is <T> – <U>. 

Bearing in mind that we are considering cases where E=T+U is constant, we find that If we bias the kinetic energy by adding to it some amount, and bias the potential energy by subtracting the same amount from it, then we get a different, imagined motion. And the action for this system is always greater than it is for the real system. If on the other hand we bias the potential energy by adding some value to it, and adjust the kinetic energy by subtracting the same value, then we get a negative action. (That is why we should say that it is the absolute action (or the magnitude of the action), for the actual motion, that is always less than it would be for any imagined motion.)

Why should we add some bias to one variable, and subtract the same bias from the other? Because we wish to maintain E=T+U as a constant. And (T+ΔT)+(U-ΔT) still equals E.

Now there is nothing mysterious about the principle of least action. It is simply a consequence of the fact that, in the case of biased T for example, (<T>-<U>)<(<T>+ΔT>)-(<U>-ΔT>). Similarly when we bias U.

In addition to classical mechanics, the Principle of Least Action plays important roles in Relativity, Quantum Theory, etc. Many interesting articles can be found on the Internet.